Level 1 Charger Plug...

What I would see offered in High School as suggestions for \'Rules of the Road\':

a. Question Authority - Always:
1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
Arthur C. Clarke
b. Truth is repeatable, independently verifiable and amenable to testing.
c. Faith as revealed religion is none of those things.
d. Most -isms are only thinly disguised Faiths with a thinly disguise godhead such as the \'State\' or some individual.
e. The difference between politicians of various parties is the lies that they tell as a natural part of their practice. That they are lying is not at issue.
f. The world owes you nothing. You owe the world your very existence. Protect it as without it, you would not be.

As it applies to troubleshooting:
1. That you find a problem does not make it the only problem.
2. That you fix a problem in an item does not make the item fixed.
3. \'Good enough\' often isn\'t.

Keep in mind that the Average American:

Does not have a college education, including an Associate Degree (60%).
Does not have a passport (64%).
Speaks one language – badly (74%).
Has never traveled voluntarily more than 200 miles from his/her birthplace (57%).
Has never visited a foreign country, not even Mexico or Canada (71%).
Cannot name the Speaker of the House, even today (82%)
Cannot name the three branches of government (64%)
Cannot read at a college level (83%)
Cannot read for content (54%). This person cannot follow written-only directions.
60% of American Households do not buy any book in a year.
Does not believe in Evolution (42% creationism, 32% evolution, 26% no opinion).
Only 73% of eligible voters are registered.
Only 67% of registered voters voted in 2020.
Meaning that the average American eligible to vote does not vote (only 48.9% net). The Average American still does not vote.

This has not one damned thing to do with party, democrat, republican, libertarian, communist, green, whatever. It has to do with massive, systemic and deliberate neglect, and industrial-grade stupidity mixed equally with mil.Spec. ignorance. Quit your bitching - and work it out. It really is you, so only you can change it.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
Knuttle:

You are really challenging the Drongo from Down Under for the position of \"Village Idiot\"?

See, you will fail, as you are invincibly stupid - which cannot be fixed. Understand that it requires a basic level of talent to hold the Idiot position, and a recognizable defect that allows any given village resident to be sympathetic to your condition. You emphatically do not have the talent, your defects are entirely of your own making. But then, who knows, you may qualify in another venue, hopefully far from here.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
On 12/30/2021 2:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats fed him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks that way

It is impolite to speak about people you plonked. Worse, you are
spreading mis-information. I am a registered Independent and dislike
both parties equally.

You are attributing facts to me that do not exist. You make up stuff to
suite your stupid agenda and don\'t care about facts. Meantime, you go
off like a nut case. So be it, sensible people see you for what you are.
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 12:12:34 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> The cat adopted me;

Oh, no! Not THAT story again! I bet that cat adopted you because it realized
that you were the coolest person that ever walked the earth! <BG>
 
On 12/30/2021 12:38 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 12/30/2021 2:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats fed
him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks that
way

It is impolite to speak about people you plonked.  Worse, you are
spreading mis-information.  I am a registered Independent and dislike
both parties equally.

You are attributing facts to me that do not exist.  You make up stuff to
suite your stupid agenda and don\'t care about facts.  Meantime, you go
off like a nut case.  So be it, sensible people see you for what you are.

Yes, we do.
 
On 12/30/2021 01:02 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/30/2021 2:12 PM, rbowman wrote:

That\'s another interesting discussion -- how much of the snake oil
actually has a beneficial effect. STP oil or gas? Marvel Mystery Oil?
Bar\'s Stop Leak. I have used Bar\'s with some success but it was in a
\'62 Dodge D100. I don\'t think I\'d use it in anything made in this
century.

You seem to be intelligent so you immediately understood what I was saying.

1. Some stuff is pure snake oil (devoid of any benefits)
2. Some stuff works ok (but it has negatives they don\'t tell you about)

My comment about the cats is I\'ve seen what comes out the pipe when engines
ingest that stuff and it\'s not pretty if you wince at the loss of your
cats.

What\'s a little smoke? A friend had a \'59 chevy and thought a dose of
STP would help. We understood smoke was involved so we adjourned to a
country road at the old swimming hole where there were no houses. To
make it even better, the Chevy was filled with random camping gear.

He was having trouble getting the STP down the carb throat, but there
was enough to generate a cloud. During the process a wandering NYS
Trooper stopped to check things out. He determined he was dealing with
two clueless but non-criminal nerds and that the camping stuff wasn\'t
stolen.

His parting words were \'By the way, gomer, that\'s STP oil treatment
you\'re trying to force down the carb with a butter knife. STP gas
treatment works a lot better.\'

The friend went on to get his PhD in electronics and had a very
successful career but could be pretty dangerous in the real world. He
wasn\'t Indian but fit in with the common wisdom at RPI: \'If you wind up
with an Indian lab partner you\'ve lucked out because they\'re brilliant.
Just don\'t let them anywhere near a screwdriver.\'
 
On 12/30/2021 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats fed him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks that way

Ed\'s a long time poster and often has worthwhile comments. However he
came down with a virulent case of TDS and hasn\'t been quite the same since.
 
On 12/30/2021 8:33 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats fed
him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks that
way

Ed\'s a long time poster and often has worthwhile comments. However he
came down with a virulent case of TDS and hasn\'t been quite the same since.

That will pass in 2024. Maybe even 2022 but not sure yet.
 
On 12/30/2021 07:17 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 12/30/2021 8:33 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell
him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your
choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats
fed him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks
that way

Ed\'s a long time poster and often has worthwhile comments. However he
came down with a virulent case of TDS and hasn\'t been quite the same
since.


That will pass in 2024. Maybe even 2022 but not sure yet.

I think 2022 will be a shambles for the Democrats. I hope to hell
somebody can come up with a candidate in 2024 that doesn\'t trigger my
gag reflex.
 
On 12/30/2021 10:11 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 07:17 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 12/30/2021 8:33 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell
him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your
choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats
fed him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks
that way

Ed\'s a long time poster and often has worthwhile comments. However he
came down with a virulent case of TDS and hasn\'t been quite the same
since.


That will pass in 2024.  Maybe even 2022 but not sure yet.

I think 2022 will be a shambles for the Democrats. I hope to hell
somebody can come up with a candidate in 2024 that doesn\'t trigger my
gag reflex.
DeSantis.
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 23:11:33 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


I think 2022 will be a shambles for the Democrats. I hope to hell
somebody can come up with a candidate in 2024 that doesn\'t trigger my
gag reflex.

Let\'s just hope they won\'t come up with a candidate that will trigger your
big mouth reflex again.
 
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 18:31:15 -0700, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:


> What\'s a little smoke? A friend had a \'59 chevy and thought a dose of

Oh, no! It starts again...

<FLUSH more of the never-ending senile crap>

--
More of the usual idiotic senile gossip by lowbrowwoman:
\"It\'s been years since I\'ve been in a fast food burger joint but I used
to like Wendy\'s because they had a salad bar and baked potatoes.\"
MID: <ivdi4gF8btlU1@mid.individual.net>
 
On 12/31/2021 2:23 AM, Mike S wrote:
On 12/30/2021 10:11 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 07:17 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
On 12/30/2021 8:33 PM, rbowman wrote:
On 12/30/2021 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:
On 12/29/2021 11:37 PM, Bob F wrote:

You wasted your time.

Plonk.

Sheese, I get plonked for being honest.� Not fair!

Bob F. is likely Pawlowski becuase he knows Pawlowski is in everyone\'s
killfile already so Bob F re-posts Pawlowski\'s idiocy.

1. Pawlowski is a rabid Democrat (I\'m not political - he is).
2. Because he\'s a rabid Democrat, he believes _everything_ they tell
him.
3. One of those things he believes is it\'s \"*My body _my_ choice*\"

Yet, when it comes to the \"vaccine\", Pawlowski says it\'s NOT your
choice.
a. Pawlowski believes with the vaccine it\'s \"*Your body _HIS_ choice*\"
b. He\'s \"being honest\" when he tells us this crap (which Democrats
fed him)
c. I\'m \"being honest\" also - when I say that only an idiot thinks
that way

Ed\'s a long time poster and often has worthwhile comments. However he
came down with a virulent case of TDS and hasn\'t been quite the same
since.


That will pass in 2024.  Maybe even 2022 but not sure yet.

I think 2022 will be a shambles for the Democrats. I hope to hell
somebody can come up with a candidate in 2024 that doesn\'t trigger my
gag reflex.
DeSantis.
He\'ll be worse than Trump. He likes being a little dictator.
 
On 12/30/2021 8:31 PM, rbowman wrote:

> What\'s a little smoke?

I once ruined a cat by letting an engine with a bad EGR situation run a bit
too long due to my complacency in a more timely fixing of the rich
condition.
 
On Thursday, November 26, 2020 at 7:30:36 AM UTC+8, Cyndi Tiger Dobrinic wrote:
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:59:54 PM UTC-5, tiger...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 4:50:38 PM UTC-4, mattz...@gmail.com wrote:

I have an old Bose AWRC-1P radio/cd player that has no audio at the
output. There is audio at the line outs. it seems that the voltage at
pin 7 of the output chip--TDA7375A is going below the threshold voltage
and forcing the chip into mute/standby mode. I have no schematic for this
thing and Bose is very reluctant to offer any assistance that doesn\'t
require forking over hundreds of dollars. I did try replacing the output
chip and it was working but then when I would turn it off, it would take
longer and longer to come on each time I turned it on again. Now I can
turn it on and wait for hours. It may come on but lately it hasn\'t. Any
clues as to where to look or does anyone know of an available schematic?


Mail me off-group with a valid address that you know can receive an
attachment of several MB, and I will send you a copy of the service manual,
which has a very good circuit description that should allow you to
troubleshoot the problem.

Arfa

Arfa,

I have the same issue with a wave radio. Can you hook me up with schematic as well??

thanks,

Matt
Did you ever get a schematic because I need one for mine too.
Can you send me one via email pdf
 
On Saturday, September 28, 2019 at 12:25:56 PM UTC+8, xusheng...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you ever get a schematic because I need one for mine too.
Can you send me one via email pdf
sa...@netease.com

Hello Arfa could you please send me also the schematic diagram of bose wave radio Service Manual 260128-0001

Thank you and best regards
 
Typically, hiss of the nature you describe - not related to transmission/reception - is due to a failing driver or output device in the audio section. Since it is most likely that these functions are on a single chip, and unless that chip is able to be identified and easily changed, you are right in your diagnosis. As it is obviously defective, you should go ahead and return it if possible.

Without being judgmental, I never purchase anything from \'the bay\' on the expectation that it actually works as described. Nor would I sell anything (a very rare occurrence) that I describe as \'working\'.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA
 
BboB wrote:
=============
I know the answer might seem obvious (getting closer, checking
connections, etc) but this has me stumped. I recently acquired an older
170 Mhz based Radio Shack wireless mic and receiver for an upcoming
event. I got it off of the bay and it was advertised as fully
operational, but of course it wasn\'t. There was no audio upon receipt,
and I had to change the mic wire from the electret clip on, to the
transmitter. That got it going, but I notice that I have a lot of hiss
in the receiver. I\'ve tried moving closer, and I still have the hiss.
If I turn off the mic (put on standby), I still have hiss, although a
bit weaker as I was obviously getting some hiss from the mic which was
expected. However, the hiss that remains stumps me and I shouldn\'t be
getting it. Audio seems to be coming from the receiver fine, but with
the amount of hiss, I don\'t think I\'m going to be able to use this for
the intended purpose.

I welcome any suggestions here to solve this.

** You sure the frequency is clear ?

You might have a conflict with a DTV station.


...... Phil
 
On 1/27/22 06:49, Peter W. wrote:
Typically, hiss of the nature you describe - not related to transmission/reception - is due to a failing driver or output device in the audio section. Since it is most likely that these functions are on a single chip, and unless that chip is able to be identified and easily changed, you are right in your diagnosis. As it is obviously defective, you should go ahead and return it if possible.

Without being judgmental, I never purchase anything from \'the bay\' on the expectation that it actually works as described. Nor would I sell anything (a very rare occurrence) that I describe as \'working\'.

Peter Wieck
Melrose Park, PA

What this turned out to be was somehow caused by the preamp. I switched
out the preamps and problem solved. There must be instability in the
original preamp somewhere. You were right, definitely audio related.
Thanks for the help.
 
Vintage College Football program


https://www.collectableivy.com/
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top